Introduction
In early 2026, intangible assets remain a major part of company values. Reports from recent years, including updates from Ocean Tomo and Brand Finance, show these non-physical items—like software, patents, and data—account for around 90% of the S&P 500’s market worth. This share has stayed high, driven by tech companies where custom code and platforms create core advantages.
Software and technology assets, especially internally developed code and Software as a Service (SaaS) platforms, lead this trend. Companies build custom systems for operations, like enterprise resource planning tools or AI-driven analytics. SaaS firms develop platforms that deliver services via subscription. Valuing these involves deciding when to capitalize costs—record them as assets—and how to amortize them over time.
Early 2026 sees ongoing effects from the FASB’s ASU 2025-06, issued in September 2025. This update modernizes rules for internal-use software under ASC 350-40, removing old project stages to fit agile development. Debates continue on capitalization thresholds and amortization periods amid fast tech changes.
Current Approaches to Capitalization and Amortization
Accountants and companies follow specific rules for software costs. For internal-use software—code built for a company’s own needs—ASC 350-40 guides treatment. Costs in planning phases expense immediately. Once management commits funding and completion seems probable, eligible costs capitalize.
Post-ASU 2025-06, capitalization starts when funding commits and significant development uncertainty resolves. This fits iterative methods like agile, where work does not follow strict stages.
SaaS platforms often count as internal-use during development, even if they later generate external revenue. Many tech firms capitalize large portions of engineering salaries and related costs.
Amortization spreads capitalized costs over useful life, usually straight-line. Periods range from three to five years for most software, reflecting quick obsolescence. Some extend to seven years for stable enterprise systems.
Cloud implementation costs also capitalize under related guidance, treating certain SaaS setups like internal assets.
Predictions for Capitalization Trends in 2026
In 2026, more companies adopt the new ASU 2025-06 framework. This leads to earlier capitalization in agile projects, as uncertainty resolves faster through testing.
Tech firms increase capitalization rates. Engineering teams track time better, capturing more costs as assets. Predictions show capitalized software rising 10-15% on balance sheets for mid-sized tech companies.
SaaS platforms see broader capitalization. As firms build scalable cloud-native systems, costs for core architecture and features qualify more often. Analysts expect higher reported assets in SaaS financials.
Hybrid models emerge, blending internal code with third-party tools. Capitalization includes integration costs when they enhance proprietary platforms.
Overall, 2026 intangible asset trends favor greater recognition of software value. Companies using AI in development resolve uncertainties quicker, boosting capitalized amounts.
Predictions for Amortization Approaches in 2026
Amortization periods lengthen slightly in 2026 for stable platforms. Core SaaS backends, with modular updates, amortize over five to seven years instead of three.
Straight-line remains dominant, but some shift to usage-based for variable-load systems. This matches expense to revenue patterns better.
Impairment tests grow frequent due to AI disruptions. Faster obsolescence in some code leads to shorter lives and accelerated amortization.
SaaS firms disclose more on useful lives. Investors push for transparency, leading to conservative estimates around four years on average.
Trends point to balanced amortization that reflects longer platform lives while accounting for rapid feature changes.
Tools and Practices Supporting Valuation
New tools aid tracking in 2026. Time-tracking software integrates with accounting systems to allocate engineer hours accurately.
AI assists in assessing completion probability, helping meet capitalization thresholds.
For SaaS, metrics like annual recurring revenue tie to asset values indirectly through impairment reviews.
Companies enhance disclosures, showing capitalized amounts and amortization policies clearly.
Challenges and Risks
Subjectivity in judgments poses risks. Deciding when uncertainty resolves varies, leading to inconsistent capitalization.
Over-capitalization inflates balance sheets. If projects fail or tech shifts, large impairments follow, hitting earnings.
Shorter tech cycles cause volatility. Useful lives overestimate easily, requiring frequent revisions and write-downs.
Regulatory scrutiny increases. Auditors challenge agile-era judgments, risking restatements.
Tax differences add complexity. While book capitalization rises, tax treatments vary, creating deferred tax issues.
Opportunities
Accurate capitalization reflects true innovation value. Higher assets support better valuations and borrowing.
In M&A, capitalized software justifies premiums for tech stacks.
Longer amortization smooths earnings, aiding investor views of stable SaaS growth.
Rewards for efficient development rise. Companies resolving uncertainties fast capitalize more, boosting reported profitability.
Broader trends in 2026 intangibles encourage investment in custom code, driving competitive edges.
Conclusion
In 2026 and beyond, valuing internally developed code and SaaS platforms focuses on flexible capitalization under updated rules and realistic amortization.
Early trends show increased asset recognition, tempered by obsolescence risks. Balanced practices—using new tools and clear judgments—capture modern software worth.
Companies adapting to agile and cloud models position for stronger financials. Investors gain from better insight into tech-driven value. Overall, 2026 offers hope for rewarding software innovation, with caution on estimation challenges.
